We earn a commission when you buy through some links on this site. Commissions never change our scores or rankings. How we make money

Question · audit evidence · scores last verified 12 June 2026

How do you read a VPN no-logs audit?

Read audit_type before the badge. In the comparison file it is independent, self-published, or none, and audit_firm is filled only when this site names the firm. Four providers name one: ExpressVPN (KPMG), NordVPN (Deloitte), Proton VPN (Securitum), and Mullvad (Cure53). Surfshark is independent with no firm name stored. A no-logs audit is a point-in-time check. Scores were last verified on 12 June 2026.

The useful line in a no-logs audit is the scope, not the logo. Methodology treats a named-firm review of the logging claim as a privacy input, and a missing audit as zero extra points. This file does not store audit dates, so recency has to be checked on the privacy source URL.

Start with audit_type: independent, self-published, or none. Then look for audit_firm. KPMG on ExpressVPN, Deloitte on NordVPN, Securitum on Proton VPN, and Cure53 on Mullvad are the only firm names among 15 providers. Surfshark, Private Internet Access, Windscribe, hide.me, and TunnelBear are independent with no firm stored. VyprVPN, CyberGhost, and Hotspot Shield are self-published. PrivateVPN, IPVanish, and Ivacy are audit type none.

Privacy is 25 percent of the composite. Named-firm rows show privacy 96 for ExpressVPN, 94 for NordVPN, 98 for Proton VPN, and 95 for Mullvad. Those figures already mix jurisdiction and other features, so the firm name is not the whole number. The match engine applies the same v1.0 weights.

Match a VPN in 3 questions

What the file actually stores

Every row below is copied from vpn-comparison-2026.json. “Not named” means the audit_firm key is absent. Do not fill that gap from memory or from another site’s roundup.

Provideraudit_typeaudit_firmPrivacyComposite
ExpressVPNindependentKPMG9691
NordVPNindependentDeloitte9491
Surfsharkindependentnot named8990
Proton VPNindependentSecuritum9889
MullvadindependentCure539586
Private Internet Accessindependentnot named8285
Windscribeindependentnot named8583
hide.meindependentnot named9282
VyprVPNself-publishednot named8881
CyberGhostself-publishednot named7580
PrivateVPNnonenot named7278
IPVanishnonenot named6577
Hotspot Shieldself-publishednot named6875
Ivacynonenot named6575
TunnelBearindependentnot named8575

A short reading order

  1. Confirm audit_type. Independent, self-published, and none are different evidence classes in this dataset.
  2. If audit_firm is present, open the privacy source URL and read what was in scope. The four named firms are KPMG, Deloitte, Securitum, and Cure53.
  3. If the type is independent and the firm is blank, treat the row as “third party claimed, firm not recorded here.” Surfshark is in that group.
  4. Put the result next to jurisdiction and the privacy score. The composite still uses all eight weights.

The parent ranking of providers with stronger audit evidence is the audited no-logs guide. A kill-switch outage does not rewrite this table; that question has its own page.

Related on this site

FAQ

What do independent, self-published, and none mean in this file?

Independent means the comparison file credits a third party. Self-published means the audit record on file is the provider’s own material. None means no audit is recorded. Only ExpressVPN, NordVPN, Proton VPN, and Mullvad also store an audit_firm name.

Which providers name an audit firm?

ExpressVPN names KPMG, NordVPN names Deloitte, Proton VPN names Securitum, and Mullvad names Cure53. Surfshark, Private Internet Access, Windscribe, hide.me, and TunnelBear are audit_type independent with no firm name in the file.

Does a named firm mean the provider will never keep logs?

No. Methodology treats an audit as evidence about the configuration and policy at audit time. The comparison file does not store audit dates. A named firm raises the citation quality. It does not guarantee future behaviour.

Affiliate status: Links on this page go to official provider websites. Our NordVPN and hide.me affiliate links are on the homepage and the NordVPN review. Scores are editorial from /data/vpn-comparison-2026.json (last verified 12 June 2026). v1.0 weights are unchanged. See ethics and methodology.
Part of BestMatch Group — also compare AI, Hosting, VPS, and Robot.